CC Adi 14.29 (1975) - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature

2020-01-26T15:18:33Z

Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 26 January 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:
	<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Adi (1975)\|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 14 (1975)\|Chapter 14: Lord Caitanya's Childhood Pastimes]]'''</div>		<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Adi (1975)\|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 14 (1975)\|Chapter 14: Lord Caitanya's Childhood Pastimes]]'''</div>
	<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Adi 14.28 (1975)\|Ādi-līlā 14.28]] '''[[CC Adi 14.28 (1975)\|Ādi-līlā 14.28]] - [[CC Adi 14.30 (1975)\|Ādi-līlā 14.30]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Adi 14.30 (1975)\|Ādi-līlā 14.30]]</div>		<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Adi 14.28 (1975)\|Ādi-līlā 14.28]] '''[[CC Adi 14.28 (1975)\|Ādi-līlā 14.28]] - [[CC Adi 14.30 (1975)\|Ādi-līlā 14.30]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Adi 14.30 (1975)\|Ādi-līlā 14.30]]</div>
			{{CompareVersions\|CC\|Adi 14.29\|CC 1975\|CC 1996}}
	{{RandomImage}}		{{RandomImage}}


	~~''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''~~

	==== TEXT 29 ====		==== TEXT 29 ====

	<div class="verse">		<div class="verse">
	:~~māṭi—deha~~, ~~māṭi—bhakṣya~~, dekhaha ~~vicāri’~~		:māṭi--deha, māṭi--bhakṣya, dekhaha vicāri'
	:avicāre deha doṣa, ki balite pāri		:avicāre deha doṣa, ki balite pāri
	</div>		</div>
Line 18:		Line 17:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	~~māṭi—dirt~~; ~~deha—this~~ body; ~~māṭi—dirt~~; ~~bhakṣya—eatable~~; ~~dekhaha—just~~ try to see; ~~vicāri’—by~~ consideration; ~~avicāre—without~~ considering; ~~deha—you~~ put; ~~doṣa—fault~~ upon Me; ~~ki—what~~; ~~balite—to~~ say; ~~pāri—I~~ am able.		māṭi-dirt; deha-this body; māṭi-dirt; bhakṣya-eatable; dekhaha-just try to see; vicāri'-by consideration; avicāre-without considering; deha-you put; doṣa-fault upon Me; ki-what; balite-to say; pāri-I am able.
	</div>		</div>

Line 25:		Line 24:

	<div class="translation">		<div class="translation">
	~~“This~~ body is a transformation of dirt, and the eatables are also a transformation of dirt. Please reflect upon this. You are blaming Me without consideration. What can I say?”		"This body is a transformation of dirt, and the eatables are also a transformation of dirt. Please reflect upon this. You are blaming Me without consideration. What can I say?"
	</div>		</div>

Line 32:		Line 31:

	<div class="purport">		<div class="purport">
	This is an explanation of the Māyāvāda philosophy, which takes everything to be one. The necessities of the body, namely eating, sleeping, mating and defending, are all unnecessary in spiritual life. When one is elevated to the spiritual platform, there are no more bodily necessities, and in activities pertaining to the bodily necessities there are no spiritual considerations. In other words, the more we eat, sleep, have sex and try to defend ourselves, the more we engage in material activities. Unfortunately, Māyāvādī philosophers consider devotional activities to be bodily activities. They cannot understand the simple explanation in ~~the~~ Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG 14.26 (1972)\|BG 14.26]]):		This is an explanation of the Māyāvāda philosophy, which takes everything to be one. The necessities of the body, namely, eating, sleeping, mating and defending, are all unnecessary in spiritual life. When one is elevated to the spiritual platform there are no more bodily necessities, and in activities pertaining to the bodily necessities there are no spiritual considerations. In other words, the more we eat, sleep, have sex and try to defend ourselves, the more we engage in material activities. Unfortunately, Māyāvādī philosophers consider devotional activities to be bodily activities. They cannot understand the simple explanation in Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG 14.26 (1972)\|14.26]]):

	:māṁ ca yo ~~’vyabhicāreṇa~~ bhakti-yogena sevate		:māṁ ca yo 'vyabhicāreṇa
	:sa guṇān samatītyaitān brahma-bhūyāya kalpate		:bhakti-yogena sevate
			:sa guṇān samatītyaitān
			:brahma-bhūyāya kalpate

	~~“Anyone~~ who engages in spiritual devotional service without motivation, rendering such service for the satisfaction of the Lord, is elevated immediately to the spiritual platform, and all his activities are spiritual.” Brahma-bhūyāya refers to Brahman (spiritual) activities. Although Māyāvādī philosophers are very eager to merge into the Brahman effulgence, they have no Brahman activities. To a certain extent they recommend Brahman activities, which for them means engagement in studying the Vedānta and Sāṅkhya philosophies, but their interpretations are but dry speculation. Lacking the varieties of spiritual activity, they cannot stay for long on that platform of simply studying Vedānta or Sāṅkhya philosophy.		"Anyone who engages in spiritual devotional service without motivation, rendering such service for the satisfaction of the Lord, is elevated immediately to the spiritual platform, and all his activities are spiritual." Brahma-bhūyāya refers to Brahman (spiritual) activities. Although Māyāvādī philosophers are very eager to merge into the Brahman effulgence, they have no Brahman activities. To a certain extent they recommend Brahman activities, which for them means engagement in studying the Vedānta and Sāṅkhya philosophies, but their interpretations are but dry speculation. Lacking the varieties of spiritual activity, they cannot stay for long on that platform of simply studying Vedānta or Sāṅkhya philosophy.

	Life is meant for varieties of enjoyment. The living entity is by nature full of an enjoying spirit, as stated in the Vedānta-sūtra (1.1.12): ānanda-mayo ~~’bhyāsāt~~. In devotional service the activities are variegated and full of enjoyment. As stated in ~~the~~ Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG 9.2 (1972)\|BG 9.2]]), all devotional activities are easy to perform (su-sukhaṁ kartum) and are eternal and spiritual (avyayam). Since Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand this, they take it for granted that a ~~devotee’s~~ activities (śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇaṁ pāda-sevanam, etc. ~~([[SB 7.5.23-24\|SB 7.5.23]])~~) are all material and are therefore māyā. They also consider ~~Kṛṣṇa’s~~ advent in this universe and His activities to be māyā. Therefore, because they consider everything māyā, they are known as Māyāvādīs.		Life is meant for varieties of enjoyment. The living entity is by nature full of an enjoying spirit, as stated in the Vedānta-sūtra (1.1.12): ānanda-mayo 'bhyāsāt. In devotional service the activities are variegated and full of enjoyment. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG 9.2 (1972)\|9.2]]), all devotional activities are easy to perform (su-sukhaṁ kartum) and they are eternal and spiritual (avyayam). Since Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand this, they take it for granted that a devotee's activities (śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇaṁ pāda-sevanam, etc.) are all material and are therefore māyā. They also consider Kṛṣṇa's advent in this universe and His activities to be māyā. Therefore, because they consider everything māyā, they are known as Māyāvādīs.

	Actually, any activities performed favorably for the satisfaction of the Lord, under the direction of the spiritual master, are spiritual. But for a person to disregard the order of the spiritual master and act by concoction, accepting his nonsensical activities to be spiritual, is māyā. One must achieve the favor of the Supreme Personality of Godhead through the mercy of the spiritual master. Therefore one must first please the spiritual master, and if he is pleased, then we should understand that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is also pleased. But if the spiritual master is displeased by our actions, they are not spiritual. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura confirms this: yasya prasādād bhagavat-prasādo yasyāprasādān na gatiḥ kuto ~~’pi~~. Activities that please the spiritual master must be considered spiritual, and they should be accepted as satisfying to the Lord.		Actually, any activities performed favorably for the satisfaction of the Lord, under the direction of the spiritual master, are spiritual. But for a person to disregard the order of the spiritual master and act by concoction, accepting his nonsensical activities to be spiritual, is māyā. One must achieve the favor of the Supreme Personality of Godhead through the mercy of the spiritual master. Therefore one must first please the spiritual master, and if he is pleased, then we should understand that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is also pleased. But if the spiritual master is displeased by our actions, they are not spiritual. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura confirms this: yasya prasādād bhagavat-prasādo yasyāprasādān na gatiḥ kuto 'pi. Activities that please the spiritual master must be considered spiritual, and they should be accepted as satisfying to the Lord.

	Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu, as the supreme spiritual master, instructed His mother about the Māyāvāda philosophy. By saying that the body is dirt and eatables are also dirt, He implied that everything is māyā. This is Māyāvāda philosophy. The philosophy of the Māyāvādīs is defective because it maintains that everything is māyā but the nonsense they speak. While saying that everything is māyā, the Māyāvādī philosopher loses the opportunity of devotional service, and therefore his life is doomed. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore advised, māyāvādi-bhāṣya śunile haya sarva-nāśa ([[CC Madhya 6.169 (1975)]]). If one accepts the Māyāvāda philosophy, his advancement is doomed forever.		Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu, as the supreme spiritual master, instructed His mother about the Māyāvāda philosophy. By saying that the body is dirt and eatables are also dirt, He implied that everything is māyā. This is Māyāvāda philosophy. The philosophy of the Māyāvādīs is defective because it maintains that everything is māyā but the nonsense they speak. While saying that everything is māyā, the Māyāvādī philosopher loses the opportunity of devotional service, and therefore his life is doomed. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore advised, māyāvādi-bhāṣya śunile haya sarva-nāśa ([[CC Madhya 6.169 (1975)\|Cc. Madhya 6.169]]). If one accepts the Māyāvāda philosophy, his advancement is doomed forever.
	</div>		</div>

Vanibot: Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975

2019-03-11T04:31:02Z

Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975

New page

[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975) - Adi-lila Chapter 14|C029]]
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Adi (1975)|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 14 (1975)|Chapter 14: Lord Caitanya's Childhood Pastimes]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 14.28 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 14.28]] '''[[CC Adi 14.28 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 14.28]] - [[CC Adi 14.30 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 14.30]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 14.30 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 14.30]]</div>
{{RandomImage}}

''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''

==== TEXT 29 ====

<div class="verse">
:māṭi—deha, māṭi—bhakṣya, dekhaha vicāri’
:avicāre deha doṣa, ki balite pāri
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div class="synonyms">
māṭi—dirt; deha—this body; māṭi—dirt; bhakṣya—eatable; dekhaha—just try to see; vicāri’—by consideration; avicāre—without considering; deha—you put; doṣa—fault upon Me; ki—what; balite—to say; pāri—I am able.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div class="translation">
“This body is a transformation of dirt, and the eatables are also a transformation of dirt. Please reflect upon this. You are blaming Me without consideration. What can I say?”
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div class="purport">
This is an explanation of the Māyāvāda philosophy, which takes everything to be one. The necessities of the body, namely eating, sleeping, mating and defending, are all unnecessary in spiritual life. When one is elevated to the spiritual platform, there are no more bodily necessities, and in activities pertaining to the bodily necessities there are no spiritual considerations. In other words, the more we eat, sleep, have sex and try to defend ourselves, the more we engage in material activities. Unfortunately, Māyāvādī philosophers consider devotional activities to be bodily activities. They cannot understand the simple explanation in the Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG 14.26 (1972)|BG 14.26]]):

:māṁ ca yo ’vyabhicāreṇa bhakti-yogena sevate
:sa guṇān samatītyaitān brahma-bhūyāya kalpate

“Anyone who engages in spiritual devotional service without motivation, rendering such service for the satisfaction of the Lord, is elevated immediately to the spiritual platform, and all his activities are spiritual.” Brahma-bhūyāya refers to Brahman (spiritual) activities. Although Māyāvādī philosophers are very eager to merge into the Brahman effulgence, they have no Brahman activities. To a certain extent they recommend Brahman activities, which for them means engagement in studying the Vedānta and Sāṅkhya philosophies, but their interpretations are but dry speculation. Lacking the varieties of spiritual activity, they cannot stay for long on that platform of simply studying Vedānta or Sāṅkhya philosophy.

Life is meant for varieties of enjoyment. The living entity is by nature full of an enjoying spirit, as stated in the Vedānta-sūtra (1.1.12): ānanda-mayo ’bhyāsāt. In devotional service the activities are variegated and full of enjoyment. As stated in the Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG 9.2 (1972)|BG 9.2]]), all devotional activities are easy to perform (su-sukhaṁ kartum) and are eternal and spiritual (avyayam). Since Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand this, they take it for granted that a devotee’s activities (śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇaṁ pāda-sevanam, etc. ([[SB 7.5.23-24|SB 7.5.23]])) are all material and are therefore māyā. They also consider Kṛṣṇa’s advent in this universe and His activities to be māyā. Therefore, because they consider everything māyā, they are known as Māyāvādīs.

Actually, any activities performed favorably for the satisfaction of the Lord, under the direction of the spiritual master, are spiritual. But for a person to disregard the order of the spiritual master and act by concoction, accepting his nonsensical activities to be spiritual, is māyā. One must achieve the favor of the Supreme Personality of Godhead through the mercy of the spiritual master. Therefore one must first please the spiritual master, and if he is pleased, then we should understand that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is also pleased. But if the spiritual master is displeased by our actions, they are not spiritual. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura confirms this: yasya prasādād bhagavat-prasādo yasyāprasādān na gatiḥ kuto ’pi. Activities that please the spiritual master must be considered spiritual, and they should be accepted as satisfying to the Lord.

Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu, as the supreme spiritual master, instructed His mother about the Māyāvāda philosophy. By saying that the body is dirt and eatables are also dirt, He implied that everything is māyā. This is Māyāvāda philosophy. The philosophy of the Māyāvādīs is defective because it maintains that everything is māyā but the nonsense they speak. While saying that everything is māyā, the Māyāvādī philosopher loses the opportunity of devotional service, and therefore his life is doomed. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore advised, māyāvādi-bhāṣya śunile haya sarva-nāśa ([[CC Madhya 6.169 (1975)]]). If one accepts the Māyāvāda philosophy, his advancement is doomed forever.
</div>

<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 14.28 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 14.28]] '''[[CC Adi 14.28 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 14.28]] - [[CC Adi 14.30 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 14.30]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 14.30 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 14.30]]</div>
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__