Vanibot: Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature

2020-01-27T05:45:24Z

Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 27 January 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:
	<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)\|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 10 (1975)\|Chapter 10: The Lord's Return to Jagannātha Purī]]'''</div>		<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)\|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 10 (1975)\|Chapter 10: The Lord's Return to Jagannātha Purī]]'''</div>
	<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 10.135 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] '''[[CC Madhya 10.135 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] - [[CC Madhya 10.137 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 10.137 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]</div>		<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 10.135 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] '''[[CC Madhya 10.135 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] - [[CC Madhya 10.137 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 10.137 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]</div>
			{{CompareVersions\|CC\|Madhya 10.136\|CC 1975\|CC 1996}}
	{{RandomImage}}		{{RandomImage}}


	~~''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''~~

	==== TEXT 136 ====		==== TEXT 136 ====

	<div class="verse">		<div class="verse">
	:eta ~~śuni’~~ sārvabhauma prabhure puchila		:eta śuni' sārvabhauma prabhure puchila
	:purī-gosāñi śūdra-sevaka kāṅhe ~~ta’~~ rākhila		:purī-gosāñi śūdra-sevaka kāṅhe ta' rākhila
	</div>		</div>

Line 18:		Line 17:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	eta ~~śuni’—hearing~~ this; sārvabhauma—Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya; prabhure—unto the Lord; puchila—inquired; purī-gosāñi—Īśvara Purī; śūdra-sevaka—a servant who is a śūdra; kāṅhe ~~ta’—why~~; rākhila—kept.		eta śuni'-hearing this; sārvabhauma—Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya; prabhure—unto the Lord; puchila—inquired; purī-gosāñi—Īśvara Purī; śūdra-sevaka—a servant who is a śūdra; kāṅhe ta'—why; rākhila—kept.
	</div>		</div>

Line 25:		Line 24:

	<div class="translation">		<div class="translation">
	After hearing this, Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, ~~“Why~~ did Īśvara Purī keep a servant who comes from a śūdra family?”		After hearing this, Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, "Why did Īśvara Purī keep a servant who comes from a śūdra family?"
	</div>		</div>

Line 32:		Line 31:

	<div class="purport">		<div class="purport">
	Both Kāśīśvara and Govinda were personal servants of Īśvara Purī. After Īśvara ~~Purī’s~~ demise, Kāśīśvara went to visit all the holy places of India. Following the orders of his spiritual master, Govinda immediately went to Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu for shelter. Govinda came from a śūdra family, but because he was initiated by Īśvara Purī, he was certainly a brāhmaṇa. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya here asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu why Īśvara Purī accepted a disciple from a śūdra family. According to the smṛti-śāstra, which gives directions for the management of the varṇāśrama institution, a brāhmaṇa cannot accept a disciple from the lower castes. In other words, a kṣatriya, vaiśya or śūdra cannot be accepted as a servant. If a spiritual master accepts such a person, he is contaminated. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya therefore asked why Īśvara Purī accepted a servant or disciple born of a śūdra family.		Both Kāśīśvara and Govinda were personal servants of Īśvara Purī. After Īśvara Purī's demise, Kāśīśvara went to visit all the holy places of India. Following the orders of his spiritual master, Govinda immediately went to Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu for shelter. Govinda came from a śūdra family, but because he was initiated by Īśvara Purī, he was certainly a brāhmaṇa. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya here asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu why Īśvara Purī accepted a disciple from a śūdra family. According to the smṛti-śāstra, which gives directions for the management of the varṇāśrama institution, a brāhmaṇa cannot accept a disciple from the lower castes. In other words, a kṣatriya, vaiśya or śūdra cannot be accepted as a servant. If a spiritual master accepts such a person, he is contaminated. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya therefore asked why Īśvara Purī accepted a servant or disciple born of a śūdra family.

	In answer to this question, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied that His spiritual master, Īśvara Purī, was so empowered that he was as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As such, Īśvara Purī was the spiritual master of the whole world. He was not a servant of any mundane rule or regulation. An empowered spiritual master like Īśvara Purī can bestow his mercy upon anyone, irrespective of caste or creed. The conclusion is that ~~an empowered~~ spiritual master is authorized by Kṛṣṇa and his own guru ~~and~~ should ~~therefore~~ be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the verdict of Viśvanātha Cakravartī: sākṣād-~~dharitvena~~. An authorized spiritual master is as good as Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As Hari is free to act as He likes, the empowered spiritual master is also free. As Hari is not subject to mundane rules and regulations, the spiritual master empowered by Him is also not subject. According to the Caitanya-caritāmṛta (~~[[CC Antya 7.11 (1975)\|~~Antya-līlā 7.11]]), kṛṣṇa-śakti vinā nahe tāra pravartana. An authorized spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa can spread the glories of the holy name of the Lord, for he has power of attorney from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the mundane world, anyone possessing his ~~master’s~~ power of attorney can act on behalf of his master. Similarly, a spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa through his own bona fide spiritual master should be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the meaning of sākṣād-dharitvena. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore describes the activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the bona fide spiritual master as follows.		In answer to this question, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied that His spiritual master, Īśvara Purī, was so empowered that he was as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As such, Īśvara Purī was the spiritual master of the whole world. He was not a servant of any mundane rule or regulation. An empowered spiritual master like Īśvara Purī can bestow his mercy upon anyone, irrespective of caste or creed. The conclusion is that a spiritual master who is authorized and empowered by Kṛṣṇa and his own guru should be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the verdict of Viśvanātha Cakravartī: sākṣād-dharitvenaśā. An authorized spiritual master is as good as Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As Hari is free to act as He likes, the empowered spiritual master is also free. As Hari is not subject to mundane rules and regulations, the spiritual master empowered by Him is also not subject. According to the Caitanya-caritāmṛta (Antya-līlā 7.11), kṛṣṇa-śakti vinā nahe tāra pravartana. An authorized spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa can spread the glories of the holy name of the Lord, for he has power of attorney from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the mundane world, anyone possessing his master's power of attorney can act on behalf of his master. Similarly, a spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa through his own bona fide spiritual master should be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the meaning of sākṣād-dharitvena. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore describes the activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the bona fide spiritual master as follows.
	</div>		</div>

Vanibot: Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975

2019-03-14T03:38:46Z

Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975

New page

[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975) - Madhya-lila Chapter 10|C136]]
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 10 (1975)|Chapter 10: The Lord's Return to Jagannātha Purī]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 10.135 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] '''[[CC Madhya 10.135 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] - [[CC Madhya 10.137 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 10.137 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]</div>
{{RandomImage}}

''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''

==== TEXT 136 ====

<div class="verse">
:eta śuni’ sārvabhauma prabhure puchila
:purī-gosāñi śūdra-sevaka kāṅhe ta’ rākhila
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div class="synonyms">
eta śuni’—hearing this; sārvabhauma—Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya; prabhure—unto the Lord; puchila—inquired; purī-gosāñi—Īśvara Purī; śūdra-sevaka—a servant who is a śūdra; kāṅhe ta’—why; rākhila—kept.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div class="translation">
After hearing this, Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, “Why did Īśvara Purī keep a servant who comes from a śūdra family?”
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div class="purport">
Both Kāśīśvara and Govinda were personal servants of Īśvara Purī. After Īśvara Purī’s demise, Kāśīśvara went to visit all the holy places of India. Following the orders of his spiritual master, Govinda immediately went to Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu for shelter. Govinda came from a śūdra family, but because he was initiated by Īśvara Purī, he was certainly a brāhmaṇa. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya here asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu why Īśvara Purī accepted a disciple from a śūdra family. According to the smṛti-śāstra, which gives directions for the management of the varṇāśrama institution, a brāhmaṇa cannot accept a disciple from the lower castes. In other words, a kṣatriya, vaiśya or śūdra cannot be accepted as a servant. If a spiritual master accepts such a person, he is contaminated. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya therefore asked why Īśvara Purī accepted a servant or disciple born of a śūdra family.

In answer to this question, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied that His spiritual master, Īśvara Purī, was so empowered that he was as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As such, Īśvara Purī was the spiritual master of the whole world. He was not a servant of any mundane rule or regulation. An empowered spiritual master like Īśvara Purī can bestow his mercy upon anyone, irrespective of caste or creed. The conclusion is that an empowered spiritual master is authorized by Kṛṣṇa and his own guru and should therefore be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the verdict of Viśvanātha Cakravartī: sākṣād-dharitvena. An authorized spiritual master is as good as Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As Hari is free to act as He likes, the empowered spiritual master is also free. As Hari is not subject to mundane rules and regulations, the spiritual master empowered by Him is also not subject. According to the Caitanya-caritāmṛta ([[CC Antya 7.11 (1975)|Antya-līlā 7.11]]), kṛṣṇa-śakti vinā nahe tāra pravartana. An authorized spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa can spread the glories of the holy name of the Lord, for he has power of attorney from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the mundane world, anyone possessing his master’s power of attorney can act on behalf of his master. Similarly, a spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa through his own bona fide spiritual master should be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the meaning of sākṣād-dharitvena. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore describes the activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the bona fide spiritual master as follows.
</div>

<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 10.135 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] '''[[CC Madhya 10.135 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] - [[CC Madhya 10.137 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 10.137 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]</div>
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__

CC Madhya 10.136 (1975) - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature

Vanibot: Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975