SB 3.1.4 - Revision history

Elad: Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

2024-02-17T21:23:58Z

Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 17 February 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	''na''~~—never~~; ''hi''~~—certainly~~; ''alpa-artha''~~—small~~ (unimportant) purpose; ''udayaḥ''~~—raised~~; ''tasya''~~—his~~; ''vidurasya''~~—of~~ Vidura; ''amala-ātmanaḥ''~~—of~~ the saintly man; ''tasmin''~~—in~~ that; ''varīyasi''~~—highly~~ purposeful; ''praśnaḥ''~~—question~~; ''sādhu-vāda''~~—things~~ approved by saints and sages; ''upabṛṁhitaḥ''~~—full~~ with.		''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=na&tab=syno_o&ds=1 na]'' — never; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=hi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 hi]'' — certainly; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=alpa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 alpa]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=artha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 artha]'' — small (unimportant) purpose; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=udayaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 udayaḥ]'' — raised; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tasya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tasya]'' — his; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vidurasya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vidurasya]'' — of Vidura; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=amala&tab=syno_o&ds=1 amala]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ātmanaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ātmanaḥ]'' — of the saintly man; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tasmin&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tasmin]'' — in that; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=varīyasi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 varīyasi]'' — highly purposeful; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=praśnaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 praśnaḥ]'' — question; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sādhu&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sādhu]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vāda&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vāda]'' — things approved by saints and sages; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=upabṛṁhitaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 upabṛṁhitaḥ]'' — full with.
	</div>		</div>

Soham at 05:13, 3 May 2021

2021-05-03T05:13:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 3 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{SB_Header\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~
	{{info		{{info
	\|speaker=~~Vidura~~		\|speaker=King Parīkṣit
	\|listener=~~Uddhava~~		\|listener=Śukadeva Gosvāmī
	}}		}}
			[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 03 Chapter 01\|S04]]
			[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Pariksit Maharaja - Vanisource\|030104]]
			<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 3\|Third Canto]] - [[SB 3.1: Questions by Vidura\|Chapter 1: Questions by Vidura]]'''</div>
			<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=SB 3.1.3]] '''[[SB 3.1.3]] - [[SB 3.1.5]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=SB 3.1.5]]</div>
			{{RandomImage}}


	==== TEXT 4 ====		==== TEXT 4 ====

	<div id="~~text~~">		<div class="verse">
	na hy alpārthodayas tasya~~<br>~~		:na hy alpārthodayas tasya
	vidurasyāmalātmanaḥ~~<br>~~		:vidurasyāmalātmanaḥ
	tasmin varīyasi praśnaḥ~~<br>~~		:tasmin varīyasi praśnaḥ
	sādhu-vādopabṛṁhitaḥ~~<br>~~		:sādhu-vādopabṛṁhitaḥ
	</div>		</div>

Line 16:		Line 22:
	==== SYNONYMS ====		==== SYNONYMS ====

	<div id="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	~~na—never~~; ~~hi—certainly~~; alpa-~~artha—small~~ (unimportant) purpose; ~~udayaḥ—raised~~; ~~tasya—his~~; ~~vidurasya—of~~ Vidura; amala-~~ātmanaḥ—of~~ the saintly man; ~~tasmin—in~~ that; ~~varīyasi—highly~~ purposeful; ~~praśnaḥ—question~~; sādhu-~~vāda—things~~ approved by saints and sages; ~~upabṛṁhitaḥ—full~~ with.		''na''—never; ''hi''—certainly; ''alpa-artha''—small (unimportant) purpose; ''udayaḥ''—raised; ''tasya''—his; ''vidurasya''—of Vidura; ''amala-ātmanaḥ''—of the saintly man; ''tasmin''—in that; ''varīyasi''—highly purposeful; ''praśnaḥ''—question; ''sādhu-vāda''—things approved by saints and sages; ''upabṛṁhitaḥ''—full with.
	</div>		</div>

Line 23:		Line 29:
	==== TRANSLATION ====		==== TRANSLATION ====

	<div id="translation">		<div class="translation">
	Saint Vidura was a great and pure devotee of the Lord, and therefore his questions to His Grace Ṛṣi Maitreya must have been very purposeful, on the highest level, and approved by learned circles.		Saint Vidura was a great and pure devotee of the Lord, and therefore his questions to His Grace Ṛṣi Maitreya must have been very purposeful, on the highest level, and approved by learned circles.
	</div>		</div>
Line 30:		Line 36:
	==== PURPORT ====		==== PURPORT ====

	<div id="purport">		<div class="purport">
	Questions and answers among different classes of men have different value. Inquiries by mercantile men in a business exchange cannot be expected to be highly purposeful in spiritual values. Questions and answers by different classes of men can be guessed by the caliber of the persons concerned. In Bhagavad-gītā, the discussion was between Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna, the Supreme Person and the supreme devotee respectively. The Lord admitted Arjuna to be His devotee and friend ([[BG 4.3]]), and therefore any sane man can guess that the discussion was on the topic of the bhakti-yoga system. Actually the whole Bhagavad-gītā is based on the principle of bhakti-yoga. There is a difference between karma and karma-yoga. Karma is regulated action for the enjoyment of the fruit by the performer, but karma-yoga is action performed by the devotee for the satisfaction of the Lord. Karma-yoga is based on bhakti, or pleasing the Lord, whereas karma is based on pleasing the senses of the performer himself. According to Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, one is advised to approach a bona fide spiritual master when one is actually inclined to question from an elevated level of spiritual understanding. A common man who has no interest in spiritual values has no need to approach a spiritual master just as a matter of following fashion.		Questions and answers among different classes of men have different value. Inquiries by mercantile men in a business exchange cannot be expected to be highly purposeful in spiritual values. Questions and answers by different classes of men can be guessed by the caliber of the persons concerned. In [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)\|''Bhagavad-gītā'']], the discussion was between Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna, the Supreme Person and the supreme devotee respectively. The Lord admitted Arjuna to be His devotee and friend ([[BG 4.3 (1972)\|BG 4.3]]), and therefore any sane man can guess that the discussion was on the topic of the ''bhakti-yoga'' system. Actually the whole [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)\|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] is based on the principle of ''bhakti-yoga''. There is a difference between ''karma'' and ''karma-yoga''. ''Karma'' is regulated action for the enjoyment of the fruit by the performer, but ''karma-yoga'' is action performed by the devotee for the satisfaction of the Lord. ''Karma-yoga'' is based on ''bhakti'', or pleasing the Lord, whereas ''karma'' is based on pleasing the senses of the performer himself. According to [[Srimad-Bhagavatam\|''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'']], one is advised to approach a bona fide spiritual master when one is actually inclined to question from an elevated level of spiritual understanding. A common man who has no interest in spiritual values has no need to approach a spiritual master just as a matter of following fashion.

	As a student, Mahārāja Parīkṣit was serious about learning the science of God, and Śukadeva Gosvāmī was a bona fide spiritual master in the transcendental science. Both of them knew that the topics discussed by Vidura and Ṛṣi Maitreya were elevated, and thus Mahārāja Parīkṣit was very interested in learning from the bona fide spiritual master.		As a student, Mahārāja Parīkṣit was serious about learning the science of God, and Śukadeva Gosvāmī was a bona fide spiritual master in the transcendental science. Both of them knew that the topics discussed by Vidura and Ṛṣi Maitreya were elevated, and thus Mahārāja Parīkṣit was very interested in learning from the bona fide spiritual master.
	</div>		</div>
	__NOTOC__~~{{SB_Footer\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~

			<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=SB 3.1.3]] '''[[SB 3.1.3]] - [[SB 3.1.5]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=SB 3.1.5]]</div>
			__NOTOC__
			__NOEDITSECTION__

Acyuta: 1 revision(s)

2008-03-16T17:17:41Z

1 revision(s)

New page

{{SB_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{info
|speaker=Vidura
|listener=Uddhava
}}
==== TEXT 4 ====

<div id="text">
na hy alpārthodayas tasya<br>
vidurasyāmalātmanaḥ<br>
tasmin varīyasi praśnaḥ<br>
sādhu-vādopabṛṁhitaḥ<br>
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div id="synonyms">
na—never; hi—certainly; alpa-artha—small (unimportant) purpose; udayaḥ—raised; tasya—his; vidurasya—of Vidura; amala-ātmanaḥ—of the saintly man; tasmin—in that; varīyasi—highly purposeful; praśnaḥ—question; sādhu-vāda—things approved by saints and sages; upabṛṁhitaḥ—full with.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div id="translation">
Saint Vidura was a great and pure devotee of the Lord, and therefore his questions to His Grace Ṛṣi Maitreya must have been very purposeful, on the highest level, and approved by learned circles.
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div id="purport">
Questions and answers among different classes of men have different value. Inquiries by mercantile men in a business exchange cannot be expected to be highly purposeful in spiritual values. Questions and answers by different classes of men can be guessed by the caliber of the persons concerned. In Bhagavad-gītā, the discussion was between Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna, the Supreme Person and the supreme devotee respectively. The Lord admitted Arjuna to be His devotee and friend ([[BG 4.3]]), and therefore any sane man can guess that the discussion was on the topic of the bhakti-yoga system. Actually the whole Bhagavad-gītā is based on the principle of bhakti-yoga. There is a difference between karma and karma-yoga. Karma is regulated action for the enjoyment of the fruit by the performer, but karma-yoga is action performed by the devotee for the satisfaction of the Lord. Karma-yoga is based on bhakti, or pleasing the Lord, whereas karma is based on pleasing the senses of the performer himself. According to Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, one is advised to approach a bona fide spiritual master when one is actually inclined to question from an elevated level of spiritual understanding. A common man who has no interest in spiritual values has no need to approach a spiritual master just as a matter of following fashion.

As a student, Mahārāja Parīkṣit was serious about learning the science of God, and Śukadeva Gosvāmī was a bona fide spiritual master in the transcendental science. Both of them knew that the topics discussed by Vidura and Ṛṣi Maitreya were elevated, and thus Mahārāja Parīkṣit was very interested in learning from the bona fide spiritual master.
</div>
__NOTOC__{{SB_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}