SB 3.31.47 - Revision history

Elad: Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

2024-02-18T21:05:50Z

Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 18 February 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	''tasmāt''~~—on~~ account of death; ''na''~~—not~~; ''kāryaḥ''~~—should~~ be done; ''santrāsaḥ''~~—horror~~; ''na''~~—not~~; ''kārpaṇyam''~~—miserliness~~; ''na''~~—not~~; ''sambhramaḥ''~~—eagerness~~ for material gain; ''buddhvā''~~—realizing~~; ''jīva-gatim''~~—the~~ true nature of the living entity; ''dhīraḥ''~~—steadfast~~; ''mukta-saṅgaḥ''~~—free~~ from attachment; ''caret''~~—one~~ should move about; ''iha''~~—in~~ this world.		''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tasmāt&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tasmāt]'' — on account of death; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=na&tab=syno_o&ds=1 na]'' — not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kāryaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kāryaḥ]'' — should be done; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=santrāsaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 santrāsaḥ]'' — horror; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=na&tab=syno_o&ds=1 na]'' — not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kārpaṇyam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kārpaṇyam]'' — miserliness; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=na&tab=syno_o&ds=1 na]'' — not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sambhramaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sambhramaḥ]'' — eagerness for material gain; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=buddhvā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 buddhvā]'' — realizing; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=jīva&tab=syno_o&ds=1 jīva]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=gatim&tab=syno_o&ds=1 gatim]'' — the true nature of the living entity; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=dhīraḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 dhīraḥ]'' — steadfast; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=mukta&tab=syno_o&ds=1 mukta]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=saṅgaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 saṅgaḥ]'' — free from attachment; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=caret&tab=syno_o&ds=1 caret]'' — one should move about; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=iha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 iha]'' — in this world.
	</div>		</div>

Soham at 08:49, 10 May 2021

2021-05-10T08:49:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 10 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{SB_Header\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~
	{{info		{{info
	\|speaker=Lord Kapiladeva the Supreme Personaliy of Godhead		\|speaker=Lord Kapiladeva the Supreme Personaliy of Godhead
	\|listener=Devahūti, mother of Lord Kapiladeva		\|listener=Devahūti, mother of Lord Kapiladeva
	}}		}}
			[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 03 Chapter 31]]
			[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Lord Kapila - Vanisource\|033147]]
			<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 3\|Third Canto]] - [[SB 3.31: Lord Kapila's Instructions on the Movements of the Living Entities\|Chapter 31: Lord Kapila's Instructions on the Movements of the Living Entities]]'''</div>
			<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=SB 3.31.45-46]] '''[[SB 3.31.45-46]] - [[SB 3.31.48]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=SB 3.31.48]]</div>
			{{RandomImage}}


	==== TEXT 47 ====		==== TEXT 47 ====

	<div id="~~text~~">		<div class="verse">
	tasmān na kāryaḥ santrāso~~<br>~~		:tasmān na kāryaḥ santrāso
	na kārpaṇyaṁ na sambhramaḥ~~<br>~~		:na kārpaṇyaṁ na sambhramaḥ
	buddhvā jīva-gatiṁ dhīro~~<br>~~		:buddhvā jīva-gatiṁ dhīro
	mukta-saṅgaś cared iha~~<br>~~		:mukta-saṅgaś cared iha
	</div>		</div>

Line 16:		Line 22:
	==== SYNONYMS ====		==== SYNONYMS ====

	<div id="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	~~tasmāt—on~~ account of death; ~~na—not~~; ~~kāryaḥ—should~~ be done; ~~santrāsaḥ—horror~~; ~~na—not~~; ~~kārpaṇyam—miserliness~~; ~~na—not~~; ~~sambhramaḥ—eagerness~~ for material gain; ~~buddhvā—realizing~~; jīva-~~gatim—the~~ true nature of the living entity; ~~dhīraḥ—steadfast~~; mukta-~~saṅgaḥ—free~~ from attachment; ~~caret—one~~ should move about; ~~iha—in~~ this world.		''tasmāt''—on account of death; ''na''—not; ''kāryaḥ''—should be done; ''santrāsaḥ''—horror; ''na''—not; ''kārpaṇyam''—miserliness; ''na''—not; ''sambhramaḥ''—eagerness for material gain; ''buddhvā''—realizing; ''jīva-gatim''—the true nature of the living entity; ''dhīraḥ''—steadfast; ''mukta-saṅgaḥ''—free from attachment; ''caret''—one should move about; ''iha''—in this world.
	</div>		</div>

Line 23:		Line 29:
	==== TRANSLATION ====		==== TRANSLATION ====

	<div id="translation">		<div class="translation">
	Therefore, one should not view death with horror, nor have recourse to defining the body as soul, nor give way to exaggeration in enjoying the bodily necessities of life. Realizing the true nature of the living entity, one should move about in the world free from attachment and steadfast in purpose.		Therefore, one should not view death with horror, nor have recourse to defining the body as soul, nor give way to exaggeration in enjoying the bodily necessities of life. Realizing the true nature of the living entity, one should move about in the world free from attachment and steadfast in purpose.
	</div>		</div>
Line 30:		Line 36:
	==== PURPORT ====		==== PURPORT ====

	<div id="purport">		<div class="purport">
	A sane person who has understood the philosophy of life and death is very upset upon hearing of the horrible, hellish condition of life in the womb of the mother or outside of the mother. But one has to make a solution to the problems of life. A sane man should understand the miserable condition of this material body. Without being unnecessarily upset, he should try to find out if there is a remedy. The remedial measures can be understood when one associates with persons who are liberated. It must be understood who is actually liberated. The liberated person is described in Bhagavad-gītā: one who engages in uninterrupted devotional service to the Lord, having surpassed the stringent laws of material nature, is understood to be situated in Brahman.		A sane person who has understood the philosophy of life and death is very upset upon hearing of the horrible, hellish condition of life in the womb of the mother or outside of the mother. But one has to make a solution to the problems of life. A sane man should understand the miserable condition of this material body. Without being unnecessarily upset, he should try to find out if there is a remedy. The remedial measures can be understood when one associates with persons who are liberated. It must be understood who is actually liberated. The liberated person is described in [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)\|''Bhagavad-gītā'']]: one who engages in uninterrupted devotional service to the Lord, having surpassed the stringent laws of material nature, is understood to be situated in Brahman.

	The Supreme Personality of Godhead is beyond the material creation. It is admitted even by impersonalists like Śaṅkarācārya that Nārāyaṇa is transcendental to this material creation. As such, when one actually engages in the service of the Lord in various forms, either Nārāyaṇa or Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa or Sītā-Rāma, he is understood to be on the platform of liberation. The Bhāgavatam also confirms that liberation means to be situated in one's constitutional position. Since a living entity is eternally the servitor of the Supreme Lord, when one seriously and sincerely engages in the transcendental loving service of the Lord, he is situated in the position of liberation. One should try to associate with a liberated person, and then the problems of life, namely birth and death, can be solved.		The Supreme Personality of Godhead is beyond the material creation. It is admitted even by impersonalists like Śaṅkarācārya that Nārāyaṇa is transcendental to this material creation. As such, when one actually engages in the service of the Lord in various forms, either Nārāyaṇa or Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa or Sītā-Rāma, he is understood to be on the platform of liberation. The [[Srimad-Bhagavatam\|''Bhāgavatam'']] also confirms that liberation means to be situated in one's constitutional position. Since a living entity is eternally the servitor of the Supreme Lord, when one seriously and sincerely engages in the transcendental loving service of the Lord, he is situated in the position of liberation. One should try to associate with a liberated person, and then the problems of life, namely birth and death, can be solved.

	While discharging devotional service in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness, one should not be miserly. He should not unnecessarily show that he has renounced this world. Actually, renunciation is not possible. If one renounces his palatial building and goes to a forest, there is actually no renunciation, for the palatial building is the property of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the forest is also the property of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If he changes from one property to another, that does not mean that he renounces; he was never the proprietor of either the palace or the forest. Renunciation necessitates renouncing the false understanding that one can lord it over material nature. When one renounces this false attitude and renounces the puffed-up position that he is also God, that is real renunciation. Otherwise, there is no meaning of renunciation. Rūpa Gosvāmī advises that if one renounces anything which could be applied in the service of the Lord and does not use it for that purpose, that is called phalgu-vairāgya, insufficient or false renunciation. Everything belongs to the Supreme Personality of Godhead; therefore everything can be engaged in the service of the Lord; nothing should be used for one's sense gratification. That is real renunciation. Nor should one unnecessarily increase the necessities of the body. We should be satisfied with whatever is offered and supplied by Kṛṣṇa without much personal endeavor. We should spend our time executing devotional service in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is the solution to the problem of life and death.		While discharging devotional service in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness, one should not be miserly. He should not unnecessarily show that he has renounced this world. Actually, renunciation is not possible. If one renounces his palatial building and goes to a forest, there is actually no renunciation, for the palatial building is the property of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the forest is also the property of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If he changes from one property to another, that does not mean that he renounces; he was never the proprietor of either the palace or the forest. Renunciation necessitates renouncing the false understanding that one can lord it over material nature. When one renounces this false attitude and renounces the puffed-up position that he is also God, that is real renunciation. Otherwise, there is no meaning of renunciation. Rūpa Gosvāmī advises that if one renounces anything which could be applied in the service of the Lord and does not use it for that purpose, that is called ''phalgu-vairāgya'', insufficient or false renunciation. Everything belongs to the Supreme Personality of Godhead; therefore everything can be engaged in the service of the Lord; nothing should be used for one's sense gratification. That is real renunciation. Nor should one unnecessarily increase the necessities of the body. We should be satisfied with whatever is offered and supplied by Kṛṣṇa without much personal endeavor. We should spend our time executing devotional service in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is the solution to the problem of life and death.
	</div>		</div>
	__NOTOC__~~{{SB_Footer\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~

			<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=SB 3.31.45-46]] '''[[SB 3.31.45-46]] - [[SB 3.31.48]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=SB 3.31.48]]</div>
			__NOTOC__
			__NOEDITSECTION__

Acyuta: 1 revision(s)

2008-03-16T17:23:52Z

1 revision(s)

New page

{{SB_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{info
|speaker=Lord Kapiladeva the Supreme Personaliy of Godhead
|listener=Devahūti, mother of Lord Kapiladeva
}}
==== TEXT 47 ====

<div id="text">
tasmān na kāryaḥ santrāso<br>
na kārpaṇyaṁ na sambhramaḥ<br>
buddhvā jīva-gatiṁ dhīro<br>
mukta-saṅgaś cared iha<br>
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div id="synonyms">
tasmāt—on account of death; na—not; kāryaḥ—should be done; santrāsaḥ—horror; na—not; kārpaṇyam—miserliness; na—not; sambhramaḥ—eagerness for material gain; buddhvā—realizing; jīva-gatim—the true nature of the living entity; dhīraḥ—steadfast; mukta-saṅgaḥ—free from attachment; caret—one should move about; iha—in this world.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div id="translation">
Therefore, one should not view death with horror, nor have recourse to defining the body as soul, nor give way to exaggeration in enjoying the bodily necessities of life. Realizing the true nature of the living entity, one should move about in the world free from attachment and steadfast in purpose.
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div id="purport">
A sane person who has understood the philosophy of life and death is very upset upon hearing of the horrible, hellish condition of life in the womb of the mother or outside of the mother. But one has to make a solution to the problems of life. A sane man should understand the miserable condition of this material body. Without being unnecessarily upset, he should try to find out if there is a remedy. The remedial measures can be understood when one associates with persons who are liberated. It must be understood who is actually liberated. The liberated person is described in Bhagavad-gītā: one who engages in uninterrupted devotional service to the Lord, having surpassed the stringent laws of material nature, is understood to be situated in Brahman.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead is beyond the material creation. It is admitted even by impersonalists like Śaṅkarācārya that Nārāyaṇa is transcendental to this material creation. As such, when one actually engages in the service of the Lord in various forms, either Nārāyaṇa or Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa or Sītā-Rāma, he is understood to be on the platform of liberation. The Bhāgavatam also confirms that liberation means to be situated in one's constitutional position. Since a living entity is eternally the servitor of the Supreme Lord, when one seriously and sincerely engages in the transcendental loving service of the Lord, he is situated in the position of liberation. One should try to associate with a liberated person, and then the problems of life, namely birth and death, can be solved.

While discharging devotional service in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness, one should not be miserly. He should not unnecessarily show that he has renounced this world. Actually, renunciation is not possible. If one renounces his palatial building and goes to a forest, there is actually no renunciation, for the palatial building is the property of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the forest is also the property of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If he changes from one property to another, that does not mean that he renounces; he was never the proprietor of either the palace or the forest. Renunciation necessitates renouncing the false understanding that one can lord it over material nature. When one renounces this false attitude and renounces the puffed-up position that he is also God, that is real renunciation. Otherwise, there is no meaning of renunciation. Rūpa Gosvāmī advises that if one renounces anything which could be applied in the service of the Lord and does not use it for that purpose, that is called phalgu-vairāgya, insufficient or false renunciation. Everything belongs to the Supreme Personality of Godhead; therefore everything can be engaged in the service of the Lord; nothing should be used for one's sense gratification. That is real renunciation. Nor should one unnecessarily increase the necessities of the body. We should be satisfied with whatever is offered and supplied by Kṛṣṇa without much personal endeavor. We should spend our time executing devotional service in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is the solution to the problem of life and death.
</div>
__NOTOC__{{SB_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}