CC Madhya 2.86: Difference between revisions
m 1 revision(s) |
Yadasampati (talk | contribs) Bot: set display title |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{DISPLAYTITLE:CC Madhya 2.86 (1996)}} | ||
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Madhya-lila Chapter 02|C086]] | |||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Madhya|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 2|Chapter 2: The Ecstatic Manifestations of Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 2.85|Madhya-līlā 2.85]] '''[[CC Madhya 2.85|Madhya-līlā 2.85]] - [[CC Madhya 2.87|Madhya-līlā 2.87]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 2.87|Madhya-līlā 2.87]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 2.86|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 86 ==== | ==== TEXT 86 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
nāhi kāhāṅ savirodha, nāhi kāhāṅ anurodha, | :nāhi kāhāṅ savirodha, nāhi kāhāṅ anurodha, | ||
sahaja vastu kari vivaraṇa | :sahaja vastu kari vivaraṇa | ||
yadi haya rāgoddeśa, tāhāṅ haye āveśa, | :yadi haya rāgoddeśa, tāhāṅ haye āveśa, | ||
sahaja vastu nā yāya likhana | :sahaja vastu nā yāya likhana | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 19: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nāhi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nāhi]'' — there is not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kāhāṅ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kāhāṅ]'' — anywhere; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sa]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=virodha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 virodha]'' — opposing element; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nāhi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nāhi]'' — there is not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kāhāṅ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kāhāṅ]'' — anywhere; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=anurodha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 anurodha]'' — acceptance of someone’s opinion; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sahaja&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sahaja]'' — simple; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vastu&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vastu]'' — substance; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kari&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kari]'' — I do; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vivaraṇa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vivaraṇa]'' — description; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yadi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yadi]'' — if; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=haya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 haya]'' — there is; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=rāga&tab=syno_o&ds=1 rāga]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=uddeśa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 uddeśa]'' — someone’s attraction or obstruction; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tāhāṅ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tāhāṅ]'' — there; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=haye&tab=syno_o&ds=1 haye]'' — becoming; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=āveśa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 āveśa]'' — involved; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sahaja&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sahaja]'' — simple; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vastu&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vastu]'' — substance; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nā] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yāya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yāya]'' — is not possible; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=likhana&tab=syno_o&ds=1 likhana]'' — the writing. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 26: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
In this Caitanya-caritāmṛta there is no contradictory conclusion, nor is anyone else’s opinion accepted. I have written this book to describe the simple substance as I have heard it from superiors. If I become involved in someone’s likes and dislikes, I cannot possibly write the simple truth. | In this Caitanya-caritāmṛta there is no contradictory conclusion, nor is anyone else’s opinion accepted. I have written this book to describe the simple substance as I have heard it from superiors. If I become involved in someone’s likes and dislikes, I cannot possibly write the simple truth. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 33: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
The simplest thing for human beings is to follow their predecessors. Judgment according to mundane senses is not a very easy process. Whatever is awakened by attachment to one’s predecessor is the way of devotional service as indicated by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu. The author says, however, that he cannot consider the opinions of those who become attracted or repelled by such things, because one cannot write impartially in that way. In other words, the author is stating that he did not inject personal opinion in the Caitanya-caritāmṛta. He has simply described his spontaneous understanding from superiors. If he had been carried away by someone’s likes and dislikes, he could not have written of such a sublime subject matter in such an easy way. The actual facts are understandable to real devotees. When these facts are recorded, they are very congenial to the devotees, but one who is not a devotee cannot understand. Such is the subject matter for realization. Mundane scholarship and its concomitant attachments and detachments cannot arouse spontaneous love of Godhead. Such love cannot be described by a mundane scholar. | The simplest thing for human beings is to follow their predecessors. Judgment according to mundane senses is not a very easy process. Whatever is awakened by attachment to one’s predecessor is the way of devotional service as indicated by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu. The author says, however, that he cannot consider the opinions of those who become attracted or repelled by such things, because one cannot write impartially in that way. In other words, the author is stating that he did not inject personal opinion in the ''Caitanya-caritāmṛta''. He has simply described his spontaneous understanding from superiors. If he had been carried away by someone’s likes and dislikes, he could not have written of such a sublime subject matter in such an easy way. The actual facts are understandable to real devotees. When these facts are recorded, they are very congenial to the devotees, but one who is not a devotee cannot understand. Such is the subject matter for realization. Mundane scholarship and its concomitant attachments and detachments cannot arouse spontaneous love of Godhead. Such love cannot be described by a mundane scholar. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 2.85|Madhya-līlā 2.85]] '''[[CC Madhya 2.85|Madhya-līlā 2.85]] - [[CC Madhya 2.87|Madhya-līlā 2.87]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 2.87|Madhya-līlā 2.87]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Latest revision as of 02:26, 4 June 2026
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 86
- nāhi kāhāṅ savirodha, nāhi kāhāṅ anurodha,
- sahaja vastu kari vivaraṇa
- yadi haya rāgoddeśa, tāhāṅ haye āveśa,
- sahaja vastu nā yāya likhana
SYNONYMS
nāhi — there is not; kāhāṅ — anywhere; sa-virodha — opposing element; nāhi — there is not; kāhāṅ — anywhere; anurodha — acceptance of someone’s opinion; sahaja — simple; vastu — substance; kari — I do; vivaraṇa — description; yadi — if; haya — there is; rāga-uddeśa — someone’s attraction or obstruction; tāhāṅ — there; haye — becoming; āveśa — involved; sahaja — simple; vastu — substance; nā yāya — is not possible; likhana — the writing.
TRANSLATION
In this Caitanya-caritāmṛta there is no contradictory conclusion, nor is anyone else’s opinion accepted. I have written this book to describe the simple substance as I have heard it from superiors. If I become involved in someone’s likes and dislikes, I cannot possibly write the simple truth.
PURPORT
The simplest thing for human beings is to follow their predecessors. Judgment according to mundane senses is not a very easy process. Whatever is awakened by attachment to one’s predecessor is the way of devotional service as indicated by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu. The author says, however, that he cannot consider the opinions of those who become attracted or repelled by such things, because one cannot write impartially in that way. In other words, the author is stating that he did not inject personal opinion in the Caitanya-caritāmṛta. He has simply described his spontaneous understanding from superiors. If he had been carried away by someone’s likes and dislikes, he could not have written of such a sublime subject matter in such an easy way. The actual facts are understandable to real devotees. When these facts are recorded, they are very congenial to the devotees, but one who is not a devotee cannot understand. Such is the subject matter for realization. Mundane scholarship and its concomitant attachments and detachments cannot arouse spontaneous love of Godhead. Such love cannot be described by a mundane scholar.